Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 15:42:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C06DBAC3911969461A4710DC358ADF9B3F2259CAA5140AB2093DB7F86D35251A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Titular incorrecto: la AM no "ordena" sino que "autoriza", en caso de que el juez lo considere relevante. Se indica en el propio cuerpo de la noticia y en otras fuentes https://www.europapress.es/nacional/noticia-audiencia-madrid-dice-peinado-juez-competente-investigar-si-gomez-adueno-software-ucm-20240924124112.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838560558846554468
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C06DBAC3911969461A4710DC358ADF9B3F2259CAA5140AB2093DB7F86D35251A
  • createdAtMillis - 1727192527963
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1838560558846554468C06DBAC3911969461A4710DC358ADF9B3F2259CAA5140AB2093DB7F86D35251A