Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 11:52:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E590439747FCC3028F2BE1DF25D1A6AA9B1119E496F2FBD303ECB1631E57E7DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

Refiriéndome a la nota anterior, el CIS no es una fuente imparcial, claramente y como se ha visto más de una vez, cocina los resultados en beneficio del actual gobierno.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838535436853002282
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E590439747FCC3028F2BE1DF25D1A6AA9B1119E496F2FBD303ECB1631E57E7DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1727178722103
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1838535436853002282E590439747FCC3028F2BE1DF25D1A6AA9B1119E496F2FBD303ECB1631E57E7DB