Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 11:54:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36CC6D86F635E04D07FAAB39E76C0C94B4E424C133A3D7D78C6C0E239EBE7919
Participant Details

Original Note:

El juez practicó una prueba legalmente prevista en art. 412LECRIM. No hay pruebas de que convocara a los medios ni está probado que haya filtrado la grabación. Dichas acusaciones podrían ser constitutivas de delito de calumnias del art. 205 CP https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1882-6036&tn=1&p=20230629 https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-1995-25444

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838506066067214534
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36CC6D86F635E04D07FAAB39E76C0C94B4E424C133A3D7D78C6C0E239EBE7919
  • createdAtMillis - 1727178855346
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183850606606721453436CC6D86F635E04D07FAAB39E76C0C94B4E424C133A3D7D78C6C0E239EBE7919