Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 14:12:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0B287C5ACBD3F4C89D4EB6F115E3D05A8550FA584DE1BD206D0988D3F6477C4D
Participant Details

Original Note:

C'est faux. Ce n'est absolument pas ce que dit le CNRS. https://lejournal.cnrs.fr/articles/covid-19-bilan-dune-surveillance-massive?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Mastodon

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838499657183326360
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0B287C5ACBD3F4C89D4EB6F115E3D05A8550FA584DE1BD206D0988D3F6477C4D
  • createdAtMillis - 1727187132316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 18384996571833263600B287C5ACBD3F4C89D4EB6F115E3D05A8550FA584DE1BD206D0988D3F6477C4D