Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 07:13:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 219E0C0C5D2B172DCE7DB1638846BC6AEF21094F9E6723ACD11C134143E69DD9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN. OP is literally claiming that obergefell isn’t codified when it is. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obergefell_v._Hodges

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838435304866292106
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 219E0C0C5D2B172DCE7DB1638846BC6AEF21094F9E6723ACD11C134143E69DD9
  • createdAtMillis - 1727248422520
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1838435304866292106219E0C0C5D2B172DCE7DB1638846BC6AEF21094F9E6723ACD11C134143E69DD9