Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 09:16:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9CA511966B6A6226328F77E5975C990FF5C7699D6510AA4266442059B9E9E031
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note claims the 2020 recount was accurate when their own link shows there was a discrepancy that was deemed "worrisome".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838383552767066285
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9CA511966B6A6226328F77E5975C990FF5C7699D6510AA4266442059B9E9E031
  • createdAtMillis - 1727169400066
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18383835527670662859CA511966B6A6226328F77E5975C990FF5C7699D6510AA4266442059B9E9E031