Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-25 12:54:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD4A7C691EB9D58D7AE008F805064CC9E57E2CBAFC2F4A488928D574606C31D0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The proposed note attached to the image begins with "correct", meaning nothing presented is inaccurate. Further analysis of the study referenced, including reasons for bias, should be explored in the comments. Reference Article from 2022: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01382-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838376446852513999
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD4A7C691EB9D58D7AE008F805064CC9E57E2CBAFC2F4A488928D574606C31D0
  • createdAtMillis - 1727268855277
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1838376446852513999FD4A7C691EB9D58D7AE008F805064CC9E57E2CBAFC2F4A488928D574606C31D0