Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 07:33:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B35B93FB21EC34181A1D6E89A3E1EE4A6BFC2312EAF34B2CE27C2D9C1CC1F4A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The proposed note attached to the image begins with "correct", meaning nothing presented is inaccurate. Further analysis of the study referenced, including reasons for bias, should be explored in the comments. Reference Article from 2022: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01382-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838376446852513999
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B35B93FB21EC34181A1D6E89A3E1EE4A6BFC2312EAF34B2CE27C2D9C1CC1F4A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1727163227060
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1838376446852513999B35B93FB21EC34181A1D6E89A3E1EE4A6BFC2312EAF34B2CE27C2D9C1CC1F4A5