Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 20:37:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F654B4794BD739A425F48FA5DA772EFBA91A3E8EE33CA2536E21466009C818B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The proposed note attached to the image begins with "correct", meaning nothing presented is inaccurate. Further analysis of the study referenced, including reasons for bias, should be explored in the comments. Reference Article from 2022: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01382-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838376446852513999
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F654B4794BD739A425F48FA5DA772EFBA91A3E8EE33CA2536E21466009C818B
  • createdAtMillis - 1727210235882
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18383764468525139995F654B4794BD739A425F48FA5DA772EFBA91A3E8EE33CA2536E21466009C818B