Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 19:37:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D305720C77F452B440C55929EDA27EB6BF84F98A87D36F5F57D6E317641B4EF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The proposed note attached to the image begins with "correct", meaning nothing presented is inaccurate. Further analysis of the study referenced, including reasons for bias, should be explored in the comments. Reference Article from 2022: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01382-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838376446852513999
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1D305720C77F452B440C55929EDA27EB6BF84F98A87D36F5F57D6E317641B4EF
  • createdAtMillis - 1727206666936
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18383764468525139991D305720C77F452B440C55929EDA27EB6BF84F98A87D36F5F57D6E317641B4EF