Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-24 05:40:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 02B0E3F2DA86FE4D1AB93D3AA2B54C783C0AF6B961A5E8243D553E5BE751F178
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN The proposed note attached to the image begins with "correct", meaning nothing presented is inaccurate. Further analysis of the study referenced, including reasons for bias, should be explored in the comments. Reference Article from 2022: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-022-01382-3

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838376446852513999
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 02B0E3F2DA86FE4D1AB93D3AA2B54C783C0AF6B961A5E8243D553E5BE751F178
  • createdAtMillis - 1727156423153
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183837644685251399902B0E3F2DA86FE4D1AB93D3AA2B54C783C0AF6B961A5E8243D553E5BE751F178