Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-23 21:38:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9F158EB7563D85F652657259FFE90957ED749A74620D73DDCDDFB0E368472696
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - la note déforme lourdement l etude donnée comme source, et met entre parenthèse une fausse "citation". Lisez la page 22 du rapport pour obtenir la véritable analyse, qui est beaucoup moins affirmative que ce que sous entend la community note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838257753610940844
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9F158EB7563D85F652657259FFE90957ED749A74620D73DDCDDFB0E368472696
  • createdAtMillis - 1727127490133
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18382577536109408449F158EB7563D85F652657259FFE90957ED749A74620D73DDCDDFB0E368472696