Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-23 17:15:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 24826E7A37FA19380ABFEA21ABE754F607C424101028559CC5CB563453955789
Participant Details

Original Note:

This image is unsourced, but seems to rely on the Lozier Institute's work, and anti-abortion think tank, which dramatically conflicts with previous literature on the topic, due to considering "elective and unspecified" as "no reason" In contrast, see: https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2005/reasons-us-women-have-abortions-quantitative-and-qualitative-perspectives https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/charlotte-lozier-institute-anti-abortion-research-influence-rcna151277

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838030122449801622
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 24826E7A37FA19380ABFEA21ABE754F607C424101028559CC5CB563453955789
  • createdAtMillis - 1727111735076
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183803012244980162224826E7A37FA19380ABFEA21ABE754F607C424101028559CC5CB563453955789