Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-23 03:13:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5DEE7850FB4E0C05B31F6FE30120041AAB70DE8A71DE829B6ED365F6725D2399
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - "economist.com" lol

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1838023948992229687
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5DEE7850FB4E0C05B31F6FE30120041AAB70DE8A71DE829B6ED365F6725D2399
  • createdAtMillis - 1727061211612
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18380239489922296875DEE7850FB4E0C05B31F6FE30120041AAB70DE8A71DE829B6ED365F6725D2399