Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-23 17:45:29 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D86878F80A47E3845B84BD5B70697030CF8D24587AB88A715AF454486A9274E3
Participant Details

Original Note:

The rhetorical hyperbole is not cause for a note. He clearly hasn't rampaged through ALL the 21 year old women either, so the door to satirical interpretation is wide open... https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/rhetorical-hyperbole/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837995190080229460
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D86878F80A47E3845B84BD5B70697030CF8D24587AB88A715AF454486A9274E3
  • createdAtMillis - 1727113529013
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837995190080229460D86878F80A47E3845B84BD5B70697030CF8D24587AB88A715AF454486A9274E3