Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-23 13:25:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 278F26F2E17B28BEE8217F08D68F1B42B43F948A84109E27716AFF2A59FC8D5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The rhetorical hyperbole is not cause for a note. He clearly hasn't rampaged through ALL the 21 year old women either, so the door to satirical interpretation is wide open... https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/rhetorical-hyperbole/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837995190080229460
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 278F26F2E17B28BEE8217F08D68F1B42B43F948A84109E27716AFF2A59FC8D5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1727097937157
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837995190080229460278F26F2E17B28BEE8217F08D68F1B42B43F948A84109E27716AFF2A59FC8D5A