Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-23 01:49:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 294FDC3C2E03D5F74A1D8C714CF80352BB48BF2799C972B011823DE298229B5A
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study referenced is from 1978, a time when few MDs were trained in Bayesian reasoning. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM197811022991808

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837971973747486795
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 294FDC3C2E03D5F74A1D8C714CF80352BB48BF2799C972B011823DE298229B5A
  • createdAtMillis - 1727056164845
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837971973747486795294FDC3C2E03D5F74A1D8C714CF80352BB48BF2799C972B011823DE298229B5A