Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 15:34:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C17CE9AD901427716F7E5F8F8CE309F52B37C4AB55FB36D48CDC0BEB56DF3996
Participant Details

Original Note:

To claim this was an “error” as one of the community notes claim is really pushing the limit of credibility. There are only 3 candidates on the ballot and to leave one of them out is obviously not an “oversight” but a deliberate action.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837819804184367343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C17CE9AD901427716F7E5F8F8CE309F52B37C4AB55FB36D48CDC0BEB56DF3996
  • createdAtMillis - 1727019251166
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837819804184367343C17CE9AD901427716F7E5F8F8CE309F52B37C4AB55FB36D48CDC0BEB56DF3996