Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 14:30:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B77A848E21377B4F7AA6F2C48981142732AB4EC83B05CA9234CCB126C1FF4A3
Participant Details

Original Note:

To claim this was an “error” as one of the community notes claim is really pushing the limit of credibility. There are only 3 candidates on the ballot and to leave one of them out is obviously not an “oversight” but a deliberate action.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837819804184367343
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B77A848E21377B4F7AA6F2C48981142732AB4EC83B05CA9234CCB126C1FF4A3
  • createdAtMillis - 1727015406223
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18378198041843673439B77A848E21377B4F7AA6F2C48981142732AB4EC83B05CA9234CCB126C1FF4A3