Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 09:20:14 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C1122BB21042889FDFEA2911F4EA421FEF7C360BD4D63230C3329D6F437E3426
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Article presents research papers from both sides. The proposed note "Some scientists have criticized" is an opinion which belongs in comments. Further, the post simply says there is some evidence to support a theory, which is true even if disputed by some.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837684142374293670
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C1122BB21042889FDFEA2911F4EA421FEF7C360BD4D63230C3329D6F437E3426
  • createdAtMillis - 1726996814406
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837684142374293670C1122BB21042889FDFEA2911F4EA421FEF7C360BD4D63230C3329D6F437E3426