Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 13:49:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48FE0F47F803050F4B176402BAAA25B8A2B931063A7853AE0A23F11EEF246D6E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Every time a post expressing an OPINION about Depp v Heard appears, a Community Note always shows up telling the half-truth that the op-Ed was defamatory and leaving out that Depp was found liable for accusing Heard of a “hoax.” The verdict was contradictory. Both were liable.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837681969544450307
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48FE0F47F803050F4B176402BAAA25B8A2B931063A7853AE0A23F11EEF246D6E
  • createdAtMillis - 1727012955562
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183768196954445030748FE0F47F803050F4B176402BAAA25B8A2B931063A7853AE0A23F11EEF246D6E