Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 04:25:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 84D8811123EAFA5D0B2495A44960D156D821392DFB2C52F8EB9721A97784C2E0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Some scientists have criticized the paper cited in this article, claiming that the market was not the origin of SARS2 but simply an early cluster of cases. https://biosafetynow.substack.com/p/crits-christoph-et-al-2024-retraction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837654175959634026
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 84D8811123EAFA5D0B2495A44960D156D821392DFB2C52F8EB9721A97784C2E0
  • createdAtMillis - 1726979152384
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183765417595963402684D8811123EAFA5D0B2495A44960D156D821392DFB2C52F8EB9721A97784C2E0