Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 00:27:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7028EFB60B6F166E261E68F290BC3A4AFE9EA34578112ABA5FA6401AA6911CAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The characters are all fully clothed and are not being depicted in a sexual way at all. Not only is this not child porn, but it's not even porn in general. If it was CP, then @herbsnsneks would be liable for the distribution of child porn which is against the law. https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-06/child_sexual_abuse_material_2.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837627268371566887
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7028EFB60B6F166E261E68F290BC3A4AFE9EA34578112ABA5FA6401AA6911CAE
  • createdAtMillis - 1726964837063
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18376272683715668877028EFB60B6F166E261E68F290BC3A4AFE9EA34578112ABA5FA6401AA6911CAE