Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-21 18:16:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F21ECC71BE8DF6D639230BBC19D01FA0B520E52C4F0A2EDAFAA7F6B78F5365E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This image showing journalists’ party affiliations lacks any source or citation. Be cautious with data that doesn’t provide a reference, as it’s harder to verify its accuracy. https://ninjatables.com/misleading-statistics/ https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/descriptive-statistics/misleading-graphs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1837541466819940823
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F21ECC71BE8DF6D639230BBC19D01FA0B520E52C4F0A2EDAFAA7F6B78F5365E5
createdAtMillis - 1726942579952
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1837541466819940823F21ECC71BE8DF6D639230BBC19D01FA0B520E52C4F0A2EDAFAA7F6B78F5365E5