Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-21 23:42:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D068E5968180B4F3A40CA951ED1B4A10FDAABC6AF8E656EDEF64939711F48DC5
Participant Details

Original Note:

This image showing journalists’ party affiliations lacks any source or citation. Be cautious with data that doesn’t provide a reference, as it’s harder to verify its accuracy. https://ninjatables.com/misleading-statistics/ https://www.statisticshowto.com/probability-and-statistics/descriptive-statistics/misleading-graphs/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1837541466819940823
participantId -
raterParticipantId - D068E5968180B4F3A40CA951ED1B4A10FDAABC6AF8E656EDEF64939711F48DC5
createdAtMillis - 1726962125240
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1837541466819940823D068E5968180B4F3A40CA951ED1B4A10FDAABC6AF8E656EDEF64939711F48DC5