Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 04:49:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5E6ECA4392285B39E1D307EFB04835B12A85686BE76C648682CC00E77F8C910
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUS ruled in US vs Rahimi that infringement of 2nd Amendment rights consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation are permitted by 2A. Whether the proposals meet that test is a question for SCOTUS not CN. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837446321776558316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D5E6ECA4392285B39E1D307EFB04835B12A85686BE76C648682CC00E77F8C910
  • createdAtMillis - 1726980581957
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837446321776558316D5E6ECA4392285B39E1D307EFB04835B12A85686BE76C648682CC00E77F8C910