Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-21 14:06:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEFA31382E5E7935582537E0D5959A58F2E19B3F66E04BD0DA18549878FB3088
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUS ruled in US vs Rahimi that infringement of 2nd Amendment rights consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation are permitted by 2A. Whether the proposals meet that test is a question for SCOTUS not CN. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837446321776558316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEFA31382E5E7935582537E0D5959A58F2E19B3F66E04BD0DA18549878FB3088
  • createdAtMillis - 1726927588492
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837446321776558316CEFA31382E5E7935582537E0D5959A58F2E19B3F66E04BD0DA18549878FB3088