Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-21 13:42:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BFAEC6B7402F500B9574C707436D6C1C577BEB6A9AEEDAC1010296FDD86980E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUS ruled in US vs Rahimi that infringement of 2nd Amendment rights consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation are permitted by 2A. Whether the proposals meet that test is a question for SCOTUS not CN. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837446321776558316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BFAEC6B7402F500B9574C707436D6C1C577BEB6A9AEEDAC1010296FDD86980E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1726926148058
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837446321776558316BFAEC6B7402F500B9574C707436D6C1C577BEB6A9AEEDAC1010296FDD86980E4