Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 09:14:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3820F7259A5AECD8DE2A70E3FE6D8E5B33AB12AF11ADEA503910232C4C12D6F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

SCOTUS ruled in US vs Rahimi that infringement of 2nd Amendment rights consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation are permitted by 2A. Whether the proposals meet that test is a question for SCOTUS not CN. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/22-915_8o6b.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837446321776558316
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3820F7259A5AECD8DE2A70E3FE6D8E5B33AB12AF11ADEA503910232C4C12D6F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1726996452918
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18374463217765583163820F7259A5AECD8DE2A70E3FE6D8E5B33AB12AF11ADEA503910232C4C12D6F3