Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-21 09:07:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5F44144B6FF1E53568DBC46F3C6B9B7C9FCB0EAE64E7D8691D9B24B398365527
Participant Details

Original Note:

This lawsuit was filled for : - Peer reviewing as an unpaid job. - Prevent submission to more than one journal. - Prevent sharing while reviewing. While the author's article retraction was for Inappropriate citation of references and methodology, Errors, misrepresentation. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073824001968

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837409149459611920
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5F44144B6FF1E53568DBC46F3C6B9B7C9FCB0EAE64E7D8691D9B24B398365527
  • createdAtMillis - 1726909656220
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18374091494596119205F44144B6FF1E53568DBC46F3C6B9B7C9FCB0EAE64E7D8691D9B24B398365527