Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 03:44:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F61DA7B2D8C6CBF900294B4C446948D2B13E4600569B7E60FD6B84DFB014A346
Participant Details

Original Note:

It's clearly a typo given the sentence structure, the mere fact that no scientist would ever claim that. There is also the fact he clarified it: https://x.com/ylecun/status/1837122517909012538

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837321880824349023
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F61DA7B2D8C6CBF900294B4C446948D2B13E4600569B7E60FD6B84DFB014A346
  • createdAtMillis - 1726976661080
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837321880824349023F61DA7B2D8C6CBF900294B4C446948D2B13E4600569B7E60FD6B84DFB014A346