Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-21 01:46:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E848DB71A10D211C7BC9CC031153C01CD56F146C772D005AAC3C220FBCA8ECBC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Original post author has historically shared extensive discussion of caveats of interpreting waste-water data & (subject to those provisos) provides regular indicative extrapolation of estimated case numbers. Disagreement on methodology should be expressed in Comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837288441039433950
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E848DB71A10D211C7BC9CC031153C01CD56F146C772D005AAC3C220FBCA8ECBC
  • createdAtMillis - 1726883198266
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837288441039433950E848DB71A10D211C7BC9CC031153C01CD56F146C772D005AAC3C220FBCA8ECBC