Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-20 23:52:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA89F03EBFBD5E946265F7C3D6DD6B170B79228E9511802C3C994FF508DFC0CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Twitter algorithm is not effectively open-sourced, as the codebase is both heavily redacted and missing configuration files, therefore it cannot be tested by third parties or implemented independently. Published code is also a snapshot, not connected to live servers. https://cdt.org/insights/birds-eye-view-the-limits-of-twitters-algorithm-release/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837276292384968725
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FA89F03EBFBD5E946265F7C3D6DD6B170B79228E9511802C3C994FF508DFC0CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1726876363415
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837276292384968725FA89F03EBFBD5E946265F7C3D6DD6B170B79228E9511802C3C994FF508DFC0CC