Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-20 12:24:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA9E9D02CECBE8E3061C3B8D50F3B2A3758EF053CD3B09B121AC637D73A75282
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested CN misses the point of the tweet and clearly comes from an argumentative position. OP is recounting personal anecdote to appeal to ethos, not stating disprovable or misleading information. Additionally, the suggested source doesn’t prove the note’s assertion. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837101321809256696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA9E9D02CECBE8E3061C3B8D50F3B2A3758EF053CD3B09B121AC637D73A75282
  • createdAtMillis - 1726835079313
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837101321809256696CA9E9D02CECBE8E3061C3B8D50F3B2A3758EF053CD3B09B121AC637D73A75282