Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-22 01:48:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ADB9B093F380519CDA8B7EA1A75031A6C4A48BD1E8699F704FC7D0A3318EA98F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested CN misses the point of the tweet and clearly comes from an argumentative position. OP is recounting personal anecdote to appeal to ethos, not stating disprovable or misleading information. Additionally, the suggested source doesn’t prove the note’s assertion. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837101321809256696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ADB9B093F380519CDA8B7EA1A75031A6C4A48BD1E8699F704FC7D0A3318EA98F
  • createdAtMillis - 1726969703608
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837101321809256696ADB9B093F380519CDA8B7EA1A75031A6C4A48BD1E8699F704FC7D0A3318EA98F