Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-20 14:20:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83AB66AC512999215F46FB903BC2657F4C956414BDBB71AF68C33D84FF68E95F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested CN misses the point of the tweet and clearly comes from an argumentative position. OP is recounting personal anecdote to appeal to ethos, not stating disprovable or misleading information. Additionally, the suggested source doesn’t prove the note’s assertion. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837101321809256696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83AB66AC512999215F46FB903BC2657F4C956414BDBB71AF68C33D84FF68E95F
  • createdAtMillis - 1726842056291
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183710132180925669683AB66AC512999215F46FB903BC2657F4C956414BDBB71AF68C33D84FF68E95F