Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-20 14:30:44 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7FFE4ED4E8367F28A70C02F2B05580C2E1280FFECF4485E3516C21F2F1FFF4C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested CN misses the point of the tweet and clearly comes from an argumentative position. OP is recounting personal anecdote to appeal to ethos, not stating disprovable or misleading information. Additionally, the suggested source doesn’t prove the note’s assertion. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837101321809256696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7FFE4ED4E8367F28A70C02F2B05580C2E1280FFECF4485E3516C21F2F1FFF4C9
  • createdAtMillis - 1726842644282
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18371013218092566967FFE4ED4E8367F28A70C02F2B05580C2E1280FFECF4485E3516C21F2F1FFF4C9