Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-20 12:35:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4988E08C354B8F2CF3E24A11680EE2907CE17A3A5F0492DFAC21E543CB17BD68
Participant Details

Original Note:

Suggested CN misses the point of the tweet and clearly comes from an argumentative position. OP is recounting personal anecdote to appeal to ethos, not stating disprovable or misleading information. Additionally, the suggested source doesn’t prove the note’s assertion. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837101321809256696
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4988E08C354B8F2CF3E24A11680EE2907CE17A3A5F0492DFAC21E543CB17BD68
  • createdAtMillis - 1726835751765
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18371013218092566964988E08C354B8F2CF3E24A11680EE2907CE17A3A5F0492DFAC21E543CB17BD68