Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-20 15:35:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D3F7CF326A643706E8BC61AE4BAF41CF668BC2FA1579C35A811ADE524DA4445D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Attention, cet article date de 2014 et se base sur des données de 2013. L'OP ne mentionne pas (volontairement ?) que les résultats ne sont potentiellement plus valides aujourd'hui. https://www.latribune.fr/actualites/economie/france/20140207trib000814232/la-france-numero-un-mondial-de-la-censure-de-tweets.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837064986427822479
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D3F7CF326A643706E8BC61AE4BAF41CF668BC2FA1579C35A811ADE524DA4445D
  • createdAtMillis - 1726846502575
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837064986427822479D3F7CF326A643706E8BC61AE4BAF41CF668BC2FA1579C35A811ADE524DA4445D