Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-20 13:46:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE7E7647B3CCEC77AC1221CC9C4836BDC4DB1C8025BEE1AC609A422D787E7BD3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Attention, cet article date de 2014 et se base sur des données de 2013. L'OP ne mentionne pas (volontairement ?) que les résultats ne sont potentiellement plus valides aujourd'hui. https://www.latribune.fr/actualites/economie/france/20140207trib000814232/la-france-numero-un-mondial-de-la-censure-de-tweets.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837064986427822479
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE7E7647B3CCEC77AC1221CC9C4836BDC4DB1C8025BEE1AC609A422D787E7BD3
  • createdAtMillis - 1726839963431
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1837064986427822479CE7E7647B3CCEC77AC1221CC9C4836BDC4DB1C8025BEE1AC609A422D787E7BD3