Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-20 15:55:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0F159BB284A6C6DA3D3DB4B8C4DACA1536E2F1E7AF51033E9791F92F1B5C0A3B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the inquiry was discussing the wearing of cloth masks vs FFP2/3 masks in clinical settings. Expert witnesses did say that there was 'weak' evidence of any significant difference from clinical trials in practice (not lab tests). https://x.com/jim_reed/status/1836398314985513153

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1837064947416584530
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0F159BB284A6C6DA3D3DB4B8C4DACA1536E2F1E7AF51033E9791F92F1B5C0A3B
  • createdAtMillis - 1726847729526
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18370649474165845300F159BB284A6C6DA3D3DB4B8C4DACA1536E2F1E7AF51033E9791F92F1B5C0A3B