Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-20 12:43:46 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 031F63807A2FF30CE37640D9B7673E30F245DED14B569289A5EB9E411F5B3CA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Guardian article referenced by proposed CN is nearly 10 months old. In addition, Fidelity doesn’t determine the value of X.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836903561554440388
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 031F63807A2FF30CE37640D9B7673E30F245DED14B569289A5EB9E411F5B3CA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1726836226883
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1836903561554440388031F63807A2FF30CE37640D9B7673E30F245DED14B569289A5EB9E411F5B3CA6