Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-19 21:38:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4DEA6BB149562D056364B950EF382583187B5A3F6799BD0B2F34750B0BFCEE11
Participant Details

Original Note:

引用投稿の図は全くの誤解です。 本治験は A群:ワクチン→3か月程観察①A→プラセボ→4か月程観察②A B群:プラセボ→3か月間観察①B→ワクチン→4か月程観察②B の4観察期間で ①Aが本剤:19例妊娠,1例流産 ①Bがプラセボ:22例妊娠,2例流産 ②Aが本剤-プラセボ:14例妊娠0例流産 ②Bがプラセボ-本剤:11例妊娠1例流産 という内容です。 各観察期間をこう呼称してる事は下記pdf29Pに記載 https://www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2023/P20231122002/780009000_30500AMX00282_A100_3.pdf すなわち本剤をいずれかの時点で接種した後に妊娠した人は①A,②A,②Bで合わせて44例で流産は2例です(プラセボのみは同じく①Bで22妊娠2流産。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836859836421869994
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4DEA6BB149562D056364B950EF382583187B5A3F6799BD0B2F34750B0BFCEE11
  • createdAtMillis - 1726781915440
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18368598364218699944DEA6BB149562D056364B950EF382583187B5A3F6799BD0B2F34750B0BFCEE11