Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-20 03:21:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0086F4C5C1E0FCB56C26D77DD07E74384160F38EA1B6E2DE67BD50B5C6C5CC0F
Participant Details

Original Note:

No Note Needed- Speculation. If he had concretely mentioned a viewing audience it would be needed but something that could be interpreted in different ways, such as this tweet did, does not need a note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836823249990340854
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0086F4C5C1E0FCB56C26D77DD07E74384160F38EA1B6E2DE67BD50B5C6C5CC0F
  • createdAtMillis - 1726802484216
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18368232499903408540086F4C5C1E0FCB56C26D77DD07E74384160F38EA1B6E2DE67BD50B5C6C5CC0F