Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-19 11:40:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BD8701F1A4C4E19ABD68B8CFBDFBD34DD2CB93ADDAC669B9796AF7ED8EBCDC9E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note misses the point. Georgia law is intentionally ambiguous to only allow the procedure if the embryo died "naturally", which was not the case here. Also, when she died, the law was new and there was no guidance on how to handle such cases https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-abortion-ban-amber-thurman-death

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836717214210150759
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BD8701F1A4C4E19ABD68B8CFBDFBD34DD2CB93ADDAC669B9796AF7ED8EBCDC9E
  • createdAtMillis - 1726746015886
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1836717214210150759BD8701F1A4C4E19ABD68B8CFBDFBD34DD2CB93ADDAC669B9796AF7ED8EBCDC9E