Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-19 15:50:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A5B33E61E76D1EE5DE48B65B4E0350743481C41C2BDF480B95B84D010DD383E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note misses the point. Georgia law is intentionally ambiguous to only allow the procedure if the embryo died "naturally", which was not the case here. Also, when she died, the law was new and there was no guidance on how to handle such cases https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-abortion-ban-amber-thurman-death

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836717214210150759
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A5B33E61E76D1EE5DE48B65B4E0350743481C41C2BDF480B95B84D010DD383E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1726761031561
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1836717214210150759A5B33E61E76D1EE5DE48B65B4E0350743481C41C2BDF480B95B84D010DD383E5