Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-19 18:12:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46D93090E9359888F6B3EA3AC0D4E151CDDD36272083CB70543AF10E1C9E903F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note misses the point. Georgia law is intentionally ambiguous to only allow the procedure if the embryo died "naturally", which was not the case here. Also, when she died, the law was new and there was no guidance on how to handle such cases https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-abortion-ban-amber-thurman-death

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836717214210150759
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46D93090E9359888F6B3EA3AC0D4E151CDDD36272083CB70543AF10E1C9E903F
  • createdAtMillis - 1726769523003
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 183671721421015075946D93090E9359888F6B3EA3AC0D4E151CDDD36272083CB70543AF10E1C9E903F