Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-19 14:16:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1AFE78FA7AB4761EE88C9D400091FE9FEACB3108FD3510EAC44BFB1E214F259E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Proposed note misses the point. Georgia law is intentionally ambiguous to only allow the procedure if the embryo died "naturally", which was not the case here. Also, when she died, the law was new and there was no guidance on how to handle such cases https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-abortion-ban-amber-thurman-death

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836717214210150759
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1AFE78FA7AB4761EE88C9D400091FE9FEACB3108FD3510EAC44BFB1E214F259E
  • createdAtMillis - 1726755384715
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18367172142101507591AFE78FA7AB4761EE88C9D400091FE9FEACB3108FD3510EAC44BFB1E214F259E