Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-09-19 08:57:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 694360BE299117D3A09E8A1A139E2ED7E132FEA0C8F37F5647B2BF76D87E74C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes aren’t appropriate responses to the claim being made. If the study has methodological errors, which it probably does, those should be pointed out rather than arguments that belong in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836648518477562262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 694360BE299117D3A09E8A1A139E2ED7E132FEA0C8F37F5647B2BF76D87E74C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1726736279420
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1836648518477562262694360BE299117D3A09E8A1A139E2ED7E132FEA0C8F37F5647B2BF76D87E74C5