Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-16 22:55:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E401B2E0874FF52ED134471BF0F1D530FCFFBC5C92DBA218D789BE82537504D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes aren’t appropriate responses to the claim being made. If the study has methodological errors, which it probably does, those should be pointed out rather than arguments that belong in the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1836648518477562262
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E401B2E0874FF52ED134471BF0F1D530FCFFBC5C92DBA218D789BE82537504D
  • createdAtMillis - 1731797740180
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18366485184775622625E401B2E0874FF52ED134471BF0F1D530FCFFBC5C92DBA218D789BE82537504D